Friday, April 12, 2019
Formative Assessment Essay Example for Free
 Formative Assessment EssayAssessment is regularly conducted by classroom teachers to determine whether students learn the lessons or have acquired the skills they have been taught. However, the prevailing concept of  estimation is that it is  tending(p) after lessons. It is also viewed as extra work that consumes time that would have been better spent in teaching. Some teachers do not even have the adequate knowledge as to how to assess  flop having foc enforced more on how to teach (in contrast with how to assess) during their years in teacher training school.    As a consequence,  assessment results tend to function as a periodic snapshot of student  proficiency and as predictors of student performance on the end-of-year statewide tests ( hereditary pattern, 2007) rather than a  withall to  helper teachers during instruction. This  direct is the reason why formative assessment should be implemented. Heritage defines formative assessment as a systematic process to continuously gath   er evidence about learning. The data are used to  order a students current level of learning and to adapt lessons to help the student  scope the desired learning goal (2007). It involves strategies which  notify be categorized into three types On-the-fly-assessment which requires the teacher to provide  nimble pop-up lessons right during discussions to correct students misconceptions Planned-for-interaction which requires teachers to think of questions beforehand which would make students think and explore ideas during discussion time and, Curriculum-embedded assessment where the teacher solicits feedback by talking with the students about ongoing classroom activities like seatwork, board work or students notes.There are four core elements of formative assessment (Heritage, 2007). First, it is a  besotteds for teachers to identify the bedcover between the students current status in learning and the desired educational goals. Second, it is designed to provide feedback at multiple lev   els. Third, it encourages student involvement in the daily classroom discussion. Finally, it aims to help teachers develop learning progressions. To use formative assessment successfully, however, teachers also need to possess certain knowledge and skills.Teachers must have  acres knowledge of their subject area of expertise pedagogical knowledge knowledge of their students previous learning and assessment knowledge or knowing a variety of proper assessment strategies. With regards to the required skills, the successful  executing of formative assessment can only occur if teachers are  competent to create classroom conditions where learners  chance a sense of community and can critique each other without fear. They must also help students learn how to assess themselves.Teachers must be skilled in analyzing student inferences. Finally, they must be able to match instruction to the gap in the present skill level or knowledge of the learner. Heritages article provides a convincing argu   ment for formative assessment as it points out the  ineffectualness of current assessment methods to actually help the learner. When students perform poorly in periodical and annual exams, it becomes too late to do something about things. Students either get low grades or are not promoted to the  near level.Something could have been done halfway through the school year had formative assessments been conducted. However, formative assessment can only be seen today as an alternative to the existing views since year-end statewide assessments, for example, would be a hard practice to do away with. The present school system, specifically the public schools, have been practicing  handed-down assessment methods for decades, even the new curriculum and programs do not change things.Nevertheless, the article introduces a  challenge to educators and administrators to try this alternative if it is being lamented that the quality of the aptitude skills of the students has been regressing every y   ear. School administrators should mind the rationale  pot formative assessment, which is placing more emphasis towards reforming student performance rather than the punishment-reward system that the traditional method offers.Of course, this would mean additional training for teachers who are not used to employing formative assessment in their own classrooms and changes in the curricula of teacher training schools. Then again, the benefits of formative assessment as enumerated in the article far  outmatch all cost considerations.Reference Heritage, Margaret. (2007, October). Formative Assessment What do teachers need to know and do? Phi Delta Kappan, pp. 140-145.  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.